Search for: "2013-A Property Holdings LLC" Results 81 - 100 of 732
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
(Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020, 2018, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
(Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020, 2018, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 12:44 pm by karen
The scheme centered on BBC falsifying submissions on performance to qualify for performance incentive payments between 2013 and 2019. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 12:44 pm by karen
The scheme centered on BBC falsifying submissions on performance to qualify for performance incentive payments between 2013 and 2019. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This Court has previously held that a claim which arose after the filing of a bankruptcy petition was the property of the estate (see Barranco v Cabrini Med. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
., 110 A.D.3d 430, 430–431, 972 N.Y.S.2d 245 [1st Dept. 2013]; Matter of Jose M. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Major Holdings, LLC, held a party could not assert a CERCLA defense because its Phase l report did not comply with the EPA rule. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of San Jose (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1325, 1345 [my 11/12/13 post on which can be found here]; Clews Land & Livestock, LLC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
University Club reaffirmed the narrowness of the D.C. statute, holding that it doesn't apply to a club's ejecting a member because of his general political beliefs (as opposed to party affiliation).[8] Arboleda v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
This article will focus on two competing strands of New York case law, each rooted in a single New York Court of Appeals decision, one strand holding that tax returns are not determinative of ownership status in a closely-held business, the other holding that they are dispositive. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm by Andrew Delaney
It’s why the gummint can’t do a low flyover to get a warrant to search your property for the aforementioned pot patch. [read post]