Search for: "4th Dist. App. Court" Results 21 - 40 of 899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2007, 1:20 am
Blagojevich, (IL 4th Dist App., March 19, 2007), an Illinois state appellate court, by a vote of 2-1, dismissed a challenge brought by pharmacists and drug stores to State Board of Pharmacy rules that require drug stores to fill prescriptions for the "morning-after" pill, even where doing so violates a pharmacist's religious beliefs or conscience. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:38 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
App. 4th 331 - Cal: Court of Appeals, 4th Appellate Dist., 1st Div. 2011 - Google ScholarUsually, it is the lawyer who wants to arbitrate the attorney-client fee dispute or malpractice case. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 8:14 am by Ryan Grotz
In an action challenging the accessibility of a website to blind and visually impaired people, the Court of Appeals of the State of California, Fourth Appellate District, recently held that a California court may exercise specific jurisdiction over a Georgia LLC where the LLC purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting business in California by sending catalogs and selling over $300,000 worth of goods to California residents. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:37 am by Ryan Grotz
The Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, recently held as a matter of law that banks owe no duty to depositors to monitor other depositors’ accounts for fraud. [read post]
2 May 2022, 8:25 am by Jenna Tersteegen
The Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, recently affirmed a trial court’s order requiring compliance with an investigative subpoena served by a number of county district attorneys’ offices. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:21 am by Ryan Grotz
The Court of Appeals of the State of California, Fourth Appellate District, recently held that an arbitration provision contained in a credit card agreement was unenforceable because it sought to bar a customer from pursuing “in any forum” his claim for a public injunction. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 7:38 am by Daniel Miller
The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, recently held that a trial court erred in ruling that several borrowers' claims were precluded by a prior unlawful detainer judgment entered against them following the foreclosure sale of their home. [read post]