Search for: "A & M RECORDS, INC. v. Napster, Inc" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
If I unlawfully make copies of your copyrighted work, I’m a primary infringer. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Napster could continue to operate those with the injunction, but In the event that Napster, Inc. cannot separate the infringing and non-infringing aspects of its service, its First Amendment argument still fails. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:31 pm by My name
”[8] Copyright infringement did not reach the mainstream level of Sony until A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
The case is Capitol Records Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands… [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 11:09 am
Timer Warner Entertainment Co., 331 F.3d 13, 22 (2d Cir. 2003); In re Napster Inc., 2005 WL 1287611 at 10-11, 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1833, 2005 Copr. [read post]
8 Aug 2006, 4:15 am
Record labels have sued the file-sharing service LimeWire with a copyright infringement suit.That it happened is no surprise.The history of file-sharing lawsuits is an odd mix, however.Here is a little history.The first case on the subject is A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]