Search for: "A Just Cause v. Martinez"
Results 21 - 40
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Martinez differently today. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State Street Bank and Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State Street Bank and Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
The current leader is Martinez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
” At first blush, it’s hard to tell which is the more accurate view of Justice Scalia’s sharply worded and sarcastic dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision Tuesday in Martinez v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:02 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
The Los Angeles Times has this story about a pending California Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:16 pm
I just want to let you know. [read post]
29 May 2013, 6:25 am
Thaler, in an opinion by Justice Breyer (but announced by Justice Kennedy, because Justice Breyer was absent), the Court held by a vote of five to four that when a state’s procedural framework, by reason of its design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in… [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:55 pm
The judges questioned both sides for just over a half hour. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:44 pm
(Martinez v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:24 am
The factual circumstances in County of L.A. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:07 am
Martinez, 2007 U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:16 pm
I just want to let you know. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
"On a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR [*2]3211(a)(7), the sole criterion is whether the pleading states a cause of action, and if from its four corners factual allegations are discerned which taken together manifest any cause of action cognizable at law[,] a motion for dismissal will fail'" (Kopelowitz & Co., Inc. v Mann, 83 AD3d 793, 796, quoting Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; see… [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:56 am
Aesthetic Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm
The Facts I'll present a simplified version of the facts just to focus on the cross-enforcement question. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
Trial Court: Cause No. 2016-27737; Martinez Partners, LLP v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
Martinez (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1156, 1160). [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am
Barnes and Smith v. [read post]
