Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 1 - 20
of 11,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am
From American Songwriter: Before we had Gwen Stefani teaching us how to spell “b-a-n-a-n-a-s” in “Hollaback Girl,” there was Tammy Wynette spelling out the pains of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v T; R v B; R v C; R v H [2009] EWCA Crim 1035; [2009] WLR (D) 19 “A criminal trial without a jury did not contravene a defendant's right to a fair trial where there was a real danger of jury tampering and proposed measures to prevent such interference did not sufficiently address [...] [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:38 am
Regina v B (F); Same v P (A); Same v C (J) [2010] EWCA Crim 1857; [2010] WLR (D) 21 “A judge sitting in the Crown Court had no power to quash an indictment simply because he did not believe that the proceedings were appropriately brought or were not in the public interest when compared with his assessment of the needs of other cases and that had not changed as a result of the introduction of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2010. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:22 am
Sturgeon and others v Condor Flugdienst GmbH (Case C-402/07); Böck and another v Air France SA (Case C-432/07) [2009] WLR (D) 338 "Airline passengers whose flights were delayed by more than three hours were entitled to compensation. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:41 am
R v C [2009] UKHL 42; [2009] WLR (D) 272 “The words of s 30(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 ‘or for any other reason’ were wide enough to include an irrational fear preventing the free exercise of choice, and inability to communicate the choice made within s 30(2)(b) was not limited to physical inability. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:15 am
C&D Zodiac, Inc., October 3, 2017, Stoll, K.). [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 9:41 pm
Background This appeal arises from an inter partes review ("IPR") proceeding in which C&D Zodiac, Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:02 pm
TILLMAN AND GREAT RIVERNISSAN, LLC d/b/a GREAT RIVER NISSAN The post Nissan N. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
In Harris et. al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:43 am
Mayr v Bäckerei und Konditorei Gerhard Flöckner OHG (Case C-506/06): WLR (D) 63 “An employee who was dismissed at a time between the in vitro fertilisation of her ova and the transfer of the fertilised ova to her uterus was not "pregnant" for the purposes of Directive 92/85 on the safety and health at work of pregnant workers, but her dismissal was unlawful under Directive 76/207 on equal… [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:36 am
Sup.): 298 Affidavit in Support of Order to Show Cause 299 Exhibit A 300 Exhibit B 301 Exhibit C 302 Exhibit D 303 Exhibit E 304 Ayala Faction Response 305 Affidavit in Support of Order to Show Cause 306 Exhibit A 307 Exhibit B 308 Exhibit C 309 Exhibit D 317 Wells Fargo Letter re Interest Payment 318 Amended Order 319 Order News coverage here. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:16 am
O(B) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office: [2012] EWCA Crim 901; [2012] WLR (D) 133 “In contempt of court cases, there was a right of appeal to the Supreme Court from the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, by the route of rectification of section 378 and paragraph 45(2) of Schedule 16 to the Armed Forces Act 2006 which had deleted the reference to the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division and inserted no new reference. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:47 am
C. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:36 pm
Insofern sind die Buchstaben b und insbesondere c von Art. 17 Abs. 3 GUB/GGA-Verordnung zu absolut formuliert. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:39 pm
C. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:09 pm
(D) Neither (A) nor (B).Personally, I think that (D) is the answer least likely to be true.Regardless, the defendant is sentenced to death, and the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:50 am
Toki v Ipourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton (Case C-424/09); [2011] WLR (D) 128 “The mechanisms for the recognition of higher education diplomas pursuant to article 3(b) of Council Directive 89/48/EEC, as amended, were applicable where the profession at issue was a regulated professional activity within the meaning of the second sub-paragraph of article 1(d) of the Directive in the member state of origin, irrespective of whether the person… [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 3:16 pm
Kentucky (c) The Law: An IRS lawyer v. a Cravath tax partner (d) All of the Above According to David Schizer, the answer is (D). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:14 am
R (Tilianu) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 1397; [2010] WLR (D) 320 ” ‘Employment’ within the meaning of art 7(3)(b) and (c) of Directive 2004/38/EC did not include self-employment, with the result that an EU citizen who was no longer self-employed did not retain the status of worker and had no right to reside. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:00 pm
In Fischer v. [read post]
