Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 21 - 40 of 11,553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2008, 9:36 am
R (Heffernan) v Rent Service; [2008] WLR (D) 279 “Rent officers, in identifying the ‘locality’ under Sch 1, Pt I to the Rent Officers (Housing Benefit Functions) Order 1997, as amended, needed to assemble only enough ‘neighbourhoods’ to satisfy the requirements of para 4(6)(c). [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:09 pm by Chad Oldfather
  D, on the other hand, is very well aware that a given legal theory requires elements A, B, C, and D to be established (every single one of them), and wishes to emphasize that by God P has done nothing to establish C (nothing! [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:49 am by Rose Hughes
However, in a decision of the Irish Court of Appeal in Merck v Clonmel [2021] IECA 54, an SPC for a combination product INEGY (ezetimibe and simvastatin) was found not to contravene Article 3(d). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:19 am by sally
Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH v Betriebsrat Bord der Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH (Case C-132/11); [2012] WLR (D) 173 “A provision in a collective agreement applicable to a group of companies within the airline industry which only took into account experience acquired as a cabin crew member from the date of recruitment by a specific airline company for the purposes of grading in the employment catagories provided for in… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:19 am by sally
Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH v Betriebsrat Bord der Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH (Case C-132/11); [2012] WLR (D) 173 “A provision in a collective agreement applicable to a group of companies within the airline industry which only took into account experience acquired as a cabin crew member from the date of recruitment by a specific airline company for the purposes of grading in the employment categories provided for in… [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:07 am by tracey
F-Tex SIA v Lietuvos-Anglijos UAB „Jadecloud-Vilma“; (Case C-213/10);  [2012] WLR (D)  123 “Where a liquidator assigned a claim to have a transaction set aside derived from the national law applicable to the insolvency proceedings, the claim subsequently made by the assignee against a third party to have the transaction set aside came within the concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ within the meaning of article… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:28 am by Ron Coleman
 Here’s my take on today’s Supreme Court decision in B&B Hardware v. [read post]