Search for: "A. B. v. The Oregon Clinic"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
Box 22501 Eugene, OR 97402 Phone: (541) 689-7242 (V/TTY) Fax: (541) 461-8601 E-mail: kswezey@efn.org Web: http://www.shhhor.org Programs for Children and Youth who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Deaf and Hard of Hearing Access Program Orego [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 10:48 am
Oregon v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
§ 812(b)(1)(B). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
§ 812(b)(1)(B). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:53 am
In UMG v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:14 am
Hughes v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:31 pm
" 21 C.F.R. 1271.3(c).b. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:47 am
Faigman, Judges as “Amateur Scientists”, 86 B . [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Luke’s Hospital v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Teston, University of Idaho: Defining “clinical meaningfulness” in FDA cancer-care hearings Belinda Walzer, University of North Carolina-Greensboro: What Are The Alternatives? [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Teston, University of Idaho: Defining “clinical meaningfulness” in FDA cancer-care hearings Belinda Walzer, University of North Carolina-Greensboro: What Are The Alternatives? [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
§9:2800.59(B); Cauvin v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Diamond, et al.Amicus brief for Professor Jeffrey B. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
On July 27, 2009, Secretary Sebelius authorized the Director of the Office for Civil Rights to carry out the designation required under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act (Title XIII of Division A and Title IV of Division B of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).The designation of these Regional Office Privacy Advisors was mandated by the ARRA-HITECH provisions under Section 13403(a). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:48 pm
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 38(5): 705-715 [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 2:09 am
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 38(5): 705-715 [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:44 am
B., Robertson, B. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Baxter Healthcare Corporation, 428 Mass. 1 (1998)): Although there was conflicting testimony at the Oregon hearing as to the necessity of epidemiological data to establish causation of a disease, the judge appears to have accepted the testimony of an expert epidemiologist that, in the absence of epidemiology, it is ‘sound science…. to rely on case reports, clinical studies, in vivo tests and animal tests. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:21 pm
The case is Teater v. [read post]