Search for: "A. S. Vs. D. S."
Results 1 - 20
of 4,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Sixth Circuit Rules That Insured-vs.-Insured Exclusion Bars Coverage for Liquidation Trustee’s Claim
27 Jun 2017, 8:59 am
-insured exclusion and specifically, whether the policy’s insured-vs. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
While the federal government often lumps these two actions together (for example, in references to the “S&D process”), suspension and debarment are different—and understanding their differences is critical for making informed decisions when a contractor’s government business is in […] The post Federal Contractor Suspension vs. [read post]
D&O Insurance: "Ambiguity" Whether Insured vs. Insured Exclusion Bars Coverage for FDIC's D&O Claims
7 Jan 2013, 11:58 pm
The D&O carrier involved had sought to dismiss the suit on the grounds that the D&O policy’s insured vs. insured exclusion precluded coverage for the FDIC’s claims in its capacity of the failed Westernbank against the bank’s former directors and officers. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 1:05 pm
., that an action by the FDIC against a failed bank’s former directors and officers was excluded by a D&O policy’s “insured vs. insured” exclusion. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
The Honourable Supreme Court of India, which adjudicated the landmark judgement on S. 3(d) in Novartis AG vs Union of India (Novartis SC judgement) in April 2013 concerning the chronic myeloid leukemia drug, Glivec® (active ingredient imatinib as a mesylate salt) clarified that S. 3(d) does not bar patent protection for all incremental inventions related to chemical and pharmaceutical substances, even though it rejected Novartis’s… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:25 am
Daniel Sokol Lars Sørgard, Norwegian Competition Authority has a paper on Optimal Merger Policy: Enforcement vs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:25 am
Daniel Sokol Lars Sørgard, Norwegian Competition Authority has a paper on Optimal Merger Policy: Enforcement vs. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 5:05 pm
The individuals submitted the lawsuit as a claim to the company’s D&O insurer. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 5:13 am
Posted by D. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 5:32 pm
The company’s D&O insurer denied coverage for the board’s defense expenses based on the Insured vs. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:36 am
The Eleventh Circuit held that coverage was precluded for the entire suit based upon the company’s D&O policy’s Insured vs. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:49 am
The D&O insurers undoubtedly will also rely on Judge Story’s rejection of the FDIC’s argument that the exclusion only applies to collusive suits, as well as his rejection of the public policy arguments, in contending in other cases that the Insured vs. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:45 am
Posted by D. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:00 am
Posted by D. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:00 am
Posted by D. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:45 am
Posted by D. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
Insured exclusion is one of the standard exclusions in D&O insurance policies (although these days at least in public company D&O insurance policies, the exclusion is framed as an Entity vs. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm
In an important decision concerning D&O insurance coverage in connection with failed bank claims, the Tenth Circuit, applying Kansas law, held that a D&O policy’s insured vs. insured exclusion unambiguously precluded coverage for claims brought by the FDIC as receiver of a failed bank against the bank’s former directors and officers. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:33 pm
Posted by D. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:05 am
Tags: Department of Justice, sanctions Judge Andrew Hanen vs. [read post]
