Search for: "A.D., the mother v. Department of Children and Families"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2013, 6:25 pm
In Melody M. v Robert M., 103 A.D.3d 932 (3rd Dept. 2013), the Third Department affirmed a Family Court order that among other changes to the prior joint custody, issued an order of protection against the mother that prohibited her from, among other things, posting any communications to or about the children on any social network site. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 6:05 am
Rothschild, 60 A.D.3d 675, 875 N.Y.S.2d 155 (2nd Dept. 2009); Matter of Held v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 8:15 pm
In Miller v Miller, 90 A.D.3d 1185 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) the parties were the parents of two children, born in 2004 and 2005. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:08 am
34 A.D.3d 802 825 N.Y.S.2d 239 2006 NY Slip Op 8978 In the Matter of SURIYA ELNATANOVA, Respondent, v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 8:15 pm
In Miller v Miller, 90 A.D.3d 1185 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) the parties were the parents of two children, born in 2004 and 2005. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 7:58 pm
" According to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Fruchter v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
Siskind, 89 A.D.3d 832 and Matter of Moran v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 10:01 am
In Matter of Jonathan C., 195 A.D.2d 554, 600 N.Y.S.2d 480 (2nd Dept.1993), the Appellate Division, Second Department upheld a finding that a mother had neglected her child where she admittedly struck her five-year-old son, causing him to lose consciousness. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 2:16 pm
Shumway, 273 A.D.2d 753, 756 where the Third Department said that: “A Law Guardian should not have a particular position or decision in mind at the outset of the case before the gathering of evidence. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 8:03 pm
Freiman, 99 A.D.2d 765, 471 N.Y.S.2d 870; Matter of Gloria S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:58 pm
Van Dusen v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
Terrance J. ,96 A.D.3d 482, 945 N.Y.S.2d 693 (1st Dept); Matter of Brazie v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
the Appellate Division, First Department rejected the rule established in Baraby v Baraby, 250 A.D.2d 201, 681 N.Y.S.2d 826 (3d Dept, 1998), that in an equally shared custody case the parent who has the greater income should be considered the noncustodial parent for purposes of support. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
Krantz, 175 A.D.2d 865 [2d Dept 1991], accord Sergeon v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
Krantz, 175 A.D.2d 865 [2d Dept 1991], accord Sergeon v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
In February 2017, the Suffolk County Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a petition against the mother alleging that she derivatively neglected the child. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
Chaplin, 107 A.D.3d at 883, 969 N.Y.S.2d 67). [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
Rosenberger (63 A.D.3d 898, 882 N.Y.S.2d 426) and Pulaski v. [read post]
