Search for: "ABC COMPANIES (1-10)" Results 121 - 140 of 438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2020, 6:15 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
A woman in Washington, D.C. alleges in a $10 million lawsuit that the company was negligent in connection with a sexual assault committed by one of its drivers, who was later convicted for the attack. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Watchdogs Urge Transparency as Executives from Powerful DC Firm Floated for Biden Administration ABC News – Matthew Mosk and Mike Devine | Published: 11/12/2020 As speculation swirls over who President-elect Joe Biden will tap for top posts at intelligence and national security agencies, a number of names being publicly floated come from a Washington, D.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Second, issues arising out of the case of Prudential Assurance Company Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 39. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 1:30 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
” The ABC test referred to in this section of the Biden plan comes from the infamous A.B. 5 legislation that took effect in California on Jan. 1, 2020. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 12 November, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v… [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
What the government needed from Trump’s properties, it had to buy from Trump’s company. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider whether the respondents should still be liable to pay non-domestic rates (‘NDR’) for periods when they leased their unoccupied properties to special purpose vehicle companies (‘SPVs’) on the basis that: (1) the leases were prearranged tax avoidance schemes and the relevant statute should be interpreted accordingly; or (2) the SPVs can be disregarded by a piercing of the corporate veil. [read post]
Germany Although there is so far no corporate criminal liability for bribery under the German Criminal Code, financial penalties of up to €10 million may be imposed on the company under the German Administrative Offences Act. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:27 pm by Bryn Miller
But we think the better way to read this provision is that it requires (1) using the ABC test to determine whether individuals who work for such businesses and are not sole proprietors are employees of those businesses and (2) using the ABC test to determine whether individuals who work directly for public agencies and are not sole proprietors are employees of the public agencies. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v… [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appeal considered whether proof of an offence contrary to Regulation 30(1)(g) of the Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015 brought against a business operator as defined in Regulation (EC) No. 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing requires proof of mens rea and/or some culpable act or omission on the part of the business operator. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a report on the libel case of Chak Wing v ABC which is being heard in the Federal Court. [read post]