Search for: "ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE V US"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,782
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 8:13 am
As recently reported by healthypaws® Pet Insurance & Foundation in Cost of Pet Care: 2016, “[v]eterinarians have a greater ability to treat and save sick animals now more than ever before. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 11:57 am
Grand Reserve of Columbus LLC, v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 10:58 am
If you are a defendant or liability insurer or re-insurer or structured settlement annuity provider re-thinking your structured settlement business practices following the Spencer v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The court accepted that English law recognises the principle established in the US judgment of Cumberland Bone Co v Andes Insurance Co 64 Me 466 (1874) that a purchaser has an insurable interest if it makes a payment or part-payment of the purchase price even if neither title nor risk has passes to the purchaser. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 11:33 am
—Benjamin Franklin 1Treasure Island v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Toller v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:24 pm
An insured person must protect these rights and help us enforce them. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Manderson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:36 am
In particular, those of us who are involved in representing policyholders in the insurance purchasing process will want to play close attention to the language used in the Insured vs. [read post]
21 May 2013, 6:38 am
This case would serve as yet another example for why a person should never accept the insurance company's claimed reason for denying a claim. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:14 am
The insurers’ suggested interpretation was not commercially acceptable. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 9:45 pm
The broader and widely accepted meaning would certainly encompass the purchase of another house at a different location. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:12 am
The insured may use the payments to cover the cost of treatment, offset it or for any other purpose. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 9:40 am
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania summarily reverses lower court ruling which held that an insurer's attempt to appoint guardian for minor plaintiff whose parents are refusing to accept the insurer's settlement offer is not an abuse of process: On Thursday of last week, Pennsylvania's highest court issued a summary reversal in a case captioned Cruz v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:52 pm
Standard Oil offers us two important takeaways. [read post]
4 May 2014, 11:00 pm
In Casey v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 11:00 pm
In Casey v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
Connor v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:10 am
In Zulkiewski v. [read post]
