Search for: "ACLU In response to the Court's March 27, 2017 Order"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
On March 6, 2017, President Trump issued a new executive order on immigration that superseded an order he signed on January 27. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
On March 6, 2017, President Trump issued a new executive order on immigration that superseded an order he signed on January 27. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:37 am
We begin with the employer's punishment of employee speech that led to the case in the first place: In 2017, a flock of Southwest flight attendants descended upon Washington, D.C. for the so-called "Women's March" protesting President Donald J. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
Trump then issued a revised order on March 6. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
” In response, Wall counters that the district court’s opinion was in fact “unprecedented. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
And the administration has not yet rescinded the Department of Justice’s October 2017 religious freedom guidance, which fosters discrimination in the name of religion. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Though Mr Zegers continuously denied being the author of the emails and owner of the website the court ordered a diagnostic of his computer. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit nominated by President Donald Trump, was confirmed in April 2017 to fill the vacancy created by Scalia’s death. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
It does not resolve questions about the Establishment Clause, but as I explained in March, this provision does not apply in the immigration context; in the nine months since I laid out this argument, no one has responded to it. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:20 am
In response to a FOIA request from the ACLU, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Justice released FISA Amendments Act Section 702 documents on August 23. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
As a result, lower courts had to hear cases about whether certain types of persons (e.g., convicted felons, convicted domestic violence misdemeanants, persons under domestic violence restraining orders) could be prohibited from keeping arms. [read post]
