Search for: "ACTAVIS"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,005
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
PatentsKat Neil reflects on the lexical transformation of the “troll” from stock character in Scandinavian mythology (and plastic dolls with bright colored up-combed hair...) into a staple of contemporary IP discourse, not once but twice: The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling"Kat Troll DollIPKat provided further depth commentary on Warner-Lambert v Actavis, delving into the… [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor, heard 19-20 Nov 2018. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:55 pm
Sara MoranThe Court of Appeal overturned the Patent Court’s first instance decision concerning the validity of one of ICOS’s patents (licensed to Eli Lilly) covering a 1 to 5mg dosage form of tadalafil (Cialis®) for oral administration up to a maximum of 5mg per day for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 1:16 pm
Actavis, 570 U.S. 136 (2013). [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:05 pm
In view of the CJEU’s interpretation of Article 3 SPC Regulation in Actavis/Sanofi (C-443/12) and also Actavis/Boehringer (C-577/13), the District Court concluded that in these circumstances, while a mono-SPC (ezetimibe) was already granted on the basis of the same Basis Patent, there was no room for the grant of a combination-SPC (ezetimibe + rosuvastatin). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:55 am
Rose writes that, in short, the Court dismissed Warner-Lambert's appeal that the patent was sufficiently disclosed, and upheld Actavis and Mylan's appeal that the disputed claims were not even partially sufficient. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor, heard 19-20 Nov 2018. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
Actavis, 570 U.S. 136 (2013), parties entering into trademark settlements are not immune from antitrust liability. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 12:31 pm
Actavis, 570 U.S. 136 (2013), parties entering into trademark settlements are not immune from antitrust liability. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 12:31 pm
Actavis, 570 U.S. 136 (2013), parties entering into trademark settlements are not immune from antitrust liability. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor, heard 19-20 Nov 2018. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 3:19 am
Image Credits: In NYCPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 204 [Week ending 28 Oct] Court of Appeal reaffirms UK as SEP litigation hotspot in upholding Birss J in Unwired Planet | Much Ado About FRAND: What you need to know about today's Court of Appeal Unwired Planet decision | AIPPI UK Rapid Response Event: Unwired Planet v Huawei - 13 November at 6PM | Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v… [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
It is a process claim since it concerns the preparation of the substance pregabalin, and it is a purpose-limited claim since it only covers the process if undertaken in order to treat neuropathic pain Although the Court unanimously holds that if Claims 1 and 3 had been valid, they would not have been infringed by Actavis, the justification of the ruling differs substantially between the Lords .Warner-Lambert pursued its infringement case under section 60(1)(c) and separately, under… [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 9:58 pm
By Kevin E. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:09 am
In addition, although the question answered by the CJEU dealt with article 3 (a), its legal grounds may also be applied to interpret article 3 (c), as shown by the judgment of 12 March 2015 (Case C-577/13 Actavis v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:48 am
The dust has started to settle following the Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56 handed down recently (IPKat post here). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor, heard 19-20 Nov 2018. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 12:00 am
In the UK cross-border case, the claimant Actavis was irrevocably bound to its undertaking not to challenge the validity of the Lilly patent. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
On Monday 19 and Tuesday 20 November, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:39 am
In her comment Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v Ice-World, InternKat Rose analyses this recent case to determine whether Lord Kitchin approached any of the unresolved issues left in the Actavis v Eli Lilly case.CopyrightLast year The IPKat reported on two new important referrals to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from Germany. [read post]
