Search for: "ACTAVIS"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2019, 4:15 am
The Federal Circuit recently affirmed in part and reversed in part a district court decision holding that Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:15 am
The Federal Circuit recently affirmed in part and reversed in part a district court decision holding that Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 2:03 am
Actavis Labs. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:59 pm
Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:20 am
Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:16 am
Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:42 am
The IPCom guidance are provided for readers' convenience at the end of this post.The IPCom factors have since been applied in Actavis v Pharmacia [2014] EWHC 2265 (stay was ordered), and Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences [2016] EWHC 313 (stay was not ordered) (IPKat post here).David Stone (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), applied the IPCom guidance to the fact of the case in Coloplast v Salts. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
Particularly, the claims did not cover Uplink DRX under a literal interpretation, but could be found to be essential and infringed under the doctrine of equivalents (Actavis) (para. 201). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
Little did the PatKat know, but she wasabout to get a message from the Dutchcourt saying that all may not be well in theland of equivalenceThe pemetrexed saga has, by now, obtained a hit-series-like status, with new decisions coming regularly and even more decisions yet to come. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:56 am
Or, to list a few decisions: Netherlands March 1, 2017 District Court (summary proceedings) Lilly/Sandoz Patent valid and infringed (no non-infringement defense) October 24, 2017 District Court (summary proceedings) Lilly/Teva Patent infringed (no invalidity defense) October 24, 2017 District Court (summary proceedings) Lilly/Fresenius Patent infringed May 8, 2018 Court of Appeal (summary proceedings) Teva/Lilly Patent infringed May 8, 2018 Court of Appeal (summary proceedings) Fresenius/Lilly… [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Observations on Geography while Waiting for G2/19 | AIPPI Event Report: Actavis v ICOS Supreme Court Rapid Response | Paul Rawlinson (1962-2019) | Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks | BREAKING: Council adopts DSM Directive | USPTO find two male torso-shaped perfume bottles confusingly similar | Guitar headstock not distinctive for … guitars, says EUIPO Board of Appeal | Conference report - More than Just a Game | What is bad faith? [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Observations on Geography while Waiting for G2/19 | AIPPI Event Report: Actavis v ICOS Supreme Court Rapid Response | Paul Rawlinson (1962-2019) | Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks | BREAKING: Council adopts DSM Directive | USPTO find two male torso-shaped perfume bottles confusingly similar | Guitar headstock not distinctive for … guitars, says EUIPO Board of Appeal | Conference report - More than Just a Game | What is bad faith? [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:42 pm
Background -- Actavis v Lilly Actavis v Lilly introduced the following questions when assessing infringement: 1. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:42 pm
Background -- Actavis v Lilly Actavis v Lilly introduced the following questions when assessing infringement: 1. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
In a long awaited decision by the UK Supreme Court, the matter was (finally) put to bed, at least in the UK.The case of Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corporation concerned a dosage patent owned by ICOS (EP1173181), which related to the use of tadalafil (more commonly known as Cialis) in a dosage form for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
In a long awaited decision by the UK Supreme Court, the matter was (finally) put to bed, at least in the UK.The case of Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corporation concerned a dosage patent owned by ICOS (EP1173181), which related to the use of tadalafil (more commonly known as Cialis) in a dosage form for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:59 am
Jurisdictional battles in IP were confined to memories of Actavis v Lilly and pan-European DNIs, not, what is essentially, the scope of a damages inquiry. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
If the defendant "knew the risk and decided it was best not to remove it" then that is a factor in favor of maintaining the status quo and granting an injunction (see Aldous LJ in SmithKline Beecham v Apotex [2003] FSR 31 at [40]; see also Arnold J in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 72 at [133]). [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Observations on Geography while Waiting for G2/19 | AIPPI Event Report: Actavis v ICOS Supreme Court Rapid Response | Paul Rawlinson (1962-2019) | Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks | BREAKING: Council adopts DSM Directive | USPTO find two male torso-shaped perfume bottles confusingly similar | Guitar headstock not distinctive for … guitars, says EUIPO Board of Appeal | Conference report - More than Just a Game | What is bad faith? [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
Observations on Geography while Waiting for G2/19 | AIPPI Event Report: Actavis v ICOS Supreme Court Rapid Response | Paul Rawlinson (1962-2019) | Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks | BREAKING: Council adopts DSM Directive | USPTO find two male torso-shaped perfume bottles confusingly similar | Guitar headstock not distinctive for … guitars, says EUIPO Board of Appeal | Conference report - More than Just a Game | What is bad faith? [read post]
