Search for: "ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION V ARMY"
Results 1 - 20
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2019, 2:41 am
Vice Chancellor Glasscock’s ruling last week in Carr v Global Payments Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
Sweeney v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 12:48 pm
V. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:24 pm
In advance of today’s argument in Peake v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Arlington v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:27 pm
The much anticipated judgment in Depp v News Group Newspapers ([2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)) was handed down on 2 November 2020. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:06 am
Coming literally on the heels of the BLR case, the Court issued another decision on December 9, 2008, Todd Construction Co., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy In Boumediene et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:29 am
Code § 2293, which allows the Secretary of the Army in a national emergency to “apply the resources of the Department of the Army’s civil works program … [to] the construction, operation, maintenance, and repair of authorized civil works, military construction, and civil defense projects that are essential to the national defense. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 2:18 pm
Pix credit here (Learning Map/Study Guide)Chinese Leninist theory as it has developed during the leadership of Xi Jinping has proven to be a dynamic process. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
In this sense, the most interesting part of the claim, and the one most likely to have lasting effect beyond the advancement of the interests of the direct combatants in this particular battle, is the jurisdictional claim (Hatice Cengiz v. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
This is presumably because rules that work to govern combat between traditional armies don’t effectively address asymmetric disputes where conventional militaries face off against “guerrillas”, “terrorists” or “freedom fighters” (the language depending on perspective and context). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
In early July, Cape Wind announced that it has initiated the next stages of geophysical and construction surveys that must be performed in advance of construction. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
HAVENNER, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:16 am
Code § 2293, which allows the Secretary of the Army in a national emergency to “apply the resources of the Department of the Army’s civil works program … [to] the construction, operation, maintenance, and repair of authorized civil works, military construction, and civil defense projects that are essential to the national defense. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 5:01 am
The plaintiffs in the case, Paepcke v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 pm
Melnick advanced this position himself in his testimony. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 10:26 pm
This construction is based and builds upon Justice Scalia’s 2006 plurality opinion in another major Supreme Court wetlands decision, Rapanos v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
Dep’t of the Army (D.D.C. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
