Search for: "AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION v. CUSTOM MOBILITY, INC." Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Regulatory and Administrative Initiatives (1 matter) LABOR DEPARTMENT RECOVERS $500,000 AGAINST ALABAMA HOME CARE COMPANY FOR MISCLASSIFYING HOME HEALTH WORKERS AS IC’S. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:03 pm by Guest Author
Later this year, the Court will hear oral argument in Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
The company is a residential pet care operation offering services such as feeding, walking, entertainment, medication administration, and general household chores. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
The federal system features include: Federal agency inability to choose a third party administrator. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
For Help With Investigations, Policy Updates Or Other Needs Recognized as a “Top” attorney in employee benefits, labor and employment and health care law extensively involved in health and other employee benefit and human resources policy and program design and administration representation and advocacy throughout her career, Cynthia Marcotte Stamer is a practicing attorney and Manag [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has found “insufficient evidence” to prosecute two suspected whistleblowers over the leaked CCTV footage of former Health Secretary Matt Hancock kissing his aide in his office in the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC). [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]