Search for: "AKE v. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 559
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2021, 8:12 am
The court held that by “sign[ing] a [consent] document, t[aking] a picture of it, and sen[ding] that picture to Baquero,” Berenguela-Alvarado had demonstrated “her subjective intent to allow EICB to remain in the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
In particular, Kitchin LJ in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp [2017] EWCA Civ 1834 considered a number of rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the context of ‘targeting’ towards specific Member States. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 7:54 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:37 am
Geomatrix, LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:18 pm
See p. 13.The underlying question is whether a defendant with a mental claim is entitled to an appointed, state-paid expert who is a partisan member of the defense team or whether a court's appointment of a neutral expert to examine the defendant and report to both sides meets the requirement of the high court's 1985 precedent in Ake v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
Similar to the ruling in State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
Similar to the ruling in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:35 am
., Director, Association of Village Council Presidents Tribal Justice Center BETHEL, AK – The announcement of A.D., et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
Circuit’s Guantanamo detention saga: Suleiman v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 3:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 10:33 am
Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:17 am
Basic Research, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
Dunn, No. 16-5294, involves a question regarding the degree of independence needed for appointed mental health experts under Ake v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:37 am
See State v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:55 am
The issue presented to the Supreme Court in McWilliams was this: “Whether, when this court held in Ake v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:55 am
The issue presented to the Supreme Court in McWilliams was this: “Whether, when this court held in Ake v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 6:33 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
The Indictment in U.S. v. [read post]
