Search for: "ALBERT v. ALBERT" Results 21 - 40 of 1,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
Handed down yesterday, the latest decision from the Patents County Court (Albert Packaging & Ors v Nampak Cartons & Healthcare [2011] EWPCC 15) deals with the thorny subject of unregistered designs. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 9:20 am
Directmedia Publishing GmbH v Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (Case C-304/07); [2008] WLR (D) 312 “The ‘extraction’ of the contents of a database, which the database maker had the right to prevent, entailed an act of transfer of the contents to another medium, and included electronic copying and copying by a manual process. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:41 am by centerforartlaw
By Cynthia Li and Center for Art Law Team Background Victoria and Albert Museum (the V&A), the world’s leading museum of art and design, launched its program Culture in Crisis in 2015. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:24 am by Daily Record Staff
Appellant, Albert Lee Jones, IV, after being charged with possession with intent to distribute marijuana and possession of marijuana in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, Maryland, moved to suppress the police search of his vehicle. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:26 am by sally
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 138 “The phrase ‘a self-contained part of a building’ in ss 3 and 4 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 did not, either expressly or by implication, require that a self-contained part of a building should be indivisible into smaller such parts. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 am by traceydennis
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 138 “The phrase ‘a self-contained part of a building’ in ss 3 and 4 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 did not, either expressly or by implication, require that a self-contained part of a building should be indivisible into smaller such parts. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:05 am by sally
41–60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd v Craftrule Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 185; [2011] WLR (D) 62 “The meaning of the words ‘a self-contained … part of a building’ in section 3 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 was clear and there was nothing in the section to suggest that the right to enfranchisement attached only to the smallest possible self-contained part of a building. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:10 am
I was reminded of this in learning of the death of Albert Maysles on March 5, 2015 in New York City at the age of 88. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Trusts EstatesProf
Albert Feuer (Law Offices of Albert Feuer) has recently published an article entitled, The Supreme Court Federal Life Insurance Rules Preempt State Law in Hillman v. [read post]