Search for: "ALLES v. INTERSTATE POWER CO."
Results 1 - 20
of 468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2008, 8:34 am
Even relatively short periods of unexcused delay are unreasonable as a matter of law (see Power Auth. of State of N.Y. v Westinghouse Elec. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:59 am
While in theory, Congress could preempt all state regulation on matters substantially affecting interstate commerce, in practice preemption remains the exception rather than the rule.Late eighteenth and early nineteenth century legal thinkers were very confused about the idea of concurrent powers. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 1:01 pm
Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co., and Cooley v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 1:01 pm
Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co., and Cooley v. [read post]
Waiver of indemnification claim in settlement agreement sways decision in coverage reallocation suit
8 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
In Interstate Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Katz (2006), which authorized suits under Congress’s bankruptcy power, and PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
Congress's enumerated powers are to regulate interstate commerce, and to pass laws necessary and proper to carrying that interstate regulation into effect. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:01 am
In NLRB v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp, 301 U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:01 pm
All this talk about fundamental rights, strict scrutiny, and the New Deal has made me hungry, and the only thing that can hit the spot is a tasty, healthful, and “unadulterated” snack made with Milnut produced by The Carolene Product Co. of Litchfield, Illinois. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:10 pm
Raich ruled that Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce gives it the power to ban possession of medical marijuana that had never crossed state lines or been sold in any market anywhere. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:41 pm
(U.S.S.C., June 19, 2017, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:07 am
I was extremely surprised to learn that, in her Supreme Court Petitioner's brief for the federal government, Solicitor General Elena Kagan, is not arguing that Congress has the power to enact this law under its power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Haywood v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:36 pm
[The problem is the Court's ultra-broad interpretation of Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am
Sturgeon v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Under this interpretation, states are divested of all power to regulate interstate commerce.Second, it has been suggested that the Clause gives Congress and the states concurrent power to regulate commerce. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am
Today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
