Search for: "AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 1 - 20 of 472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2013, 7:32 am by Jay Stanley
In February 2012, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in U.S. v. [read post]
This morning, the Senate Judiciary Committee held an oversight hearing focused on the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:32 pm by shahid
Since then, the Justice Department regulations have been watered down periodically, while FISA was ultimately flipped on its head. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 7:30 am by Garrett Hinck
The Privacy Shield replaced the Safe Harbor agreement after the European Court of Justice invalidated that accord in Schrems v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:08 am by Peter Margulies
When it comes to the trust deficit regarding U.S. surveillance internationally, exhibit A is the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 11:14 am by Coleman Saunders
President Trump issued an executive order instructing the Commerce Department to prevent U.S. telecommunications companies from using foreign-made equipment that could pose a national security threat to American networks, reports the New York Times. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the most recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:16 am by Margaret Taylor
This investigation is representative of the push and pull between the legislative and executive branches as Congress exercises its oversight function and of the kinds of issues this oversight function was designed to check. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:44 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The soft spot, the least tyrant-proof part of the government, is the U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm by Hyemin Han
  Han also shared former President Donald Trump’s response to the Justice Department’s motion in the Eleventh Circuit for partial stay of U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:45 pm
Retired American officials say that, for the first time in U.S. history, nobody with serious Pakistan experience is working in the South Asia bureau of the State Department, on State's policy planning staff, on the National Security Council staff or even in Vice President Cheney's office. . . . [read post]