Search for: "AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC." Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2022, 4:08 am by Adams Lee
This coalition consists of one U.S. producer McConway & Torley (M&T) and the union workers at the one other U.S. producer, Amsted Rail Company, Inc. [read post]
29 May 2017, 12:46 pm
The lawsuit was filed against multiple defendants, including: Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation Union Carbide Corporation Amsted Industries, Inc. [read post]
29 May 2017, 12:46 pm
The lawsuit was filed against multiple defendants, including: Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation Union Carbide Corporation Amsted Industries, Inc. [read post]
29 May 2017, 12:46 pm
The lawsuit was filed against multiple defendants, including: Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation Union Carbide Corporation Amsted Industries, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:22 pm by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
The Commission initiated Investigation No. 337-TA-655 based on allegations that TianRui and a group of related respondents unlawfully accessed and used Illinois-based Amsted Industries, Inc. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:53 pm
"Amsted Industries Inc. is a domestic manufacturer of cast steel railway wheels. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:06 am
Amsted Industries, Inc., the two named Plaintiffs worked at Defendants' steel foundry as an hourly leadman and hourly chipper, respectively. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 4:22 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Amsted Industries Inc. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v Unilever plc & Ors (IPKat)… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:58 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Amsted Industries Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]