Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

Keisler and Bernstein: “Trump’s Reply Brief ‘Officer’ And ‘Office’ Arguments Miss The Mark”

6 Feb 2024, 8:52 am by Rick Hasen

The following is a guest post from Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, delving deep into Trump’s hypertechnical lead argument: Former President Trump’s reply brief in Trump v. [read post]

Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/

Tune into one of the most important arguments in decades: Trump v. Anderson

6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle

Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]

Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog

:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II

6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude

For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

Travis Crum: “The Fifteenth Amendment’s Relevance to Trump v. Anderson”

5 Feb 2024, 1:32 pm by Rick Hasen

Anderson” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]

Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/

How To Listen To Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment Case at the Supreme Court

5 Feb 2024, 11:32 am by NCC Staff

For Trump v. [read post]

Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog

Explaining Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment case at the Supreme Court

5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Scott Bomboy

Trump v. [read post]

Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog

A Deep Disagreement

5 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by Bruce Ackerman

Anderson. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"

5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude

" Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

“In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II”

4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm by Howard Bashman

“In Trump v. [read post]

How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com

Bruce Ackerman Misunderstands My Point About What Colorado is Doing and May Do

4 Feb 2024, 7:55 pm by Marty Lederman

See Perry v. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection

4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman

” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

Untitled

4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman

Anderson” is based on a serious mistake. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern

4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman

Fund v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

:@WilliamBaude: The Objection That Enforcing Section Three Would Be Too "Dangerous"

4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude

The Supreme Court's unanimous landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

Did the Colorado Secretary of State help revitalize the Moore v. Harper issue ahead of the Trump v. Anderson oral argument?

4 Feb 2024, 5:15 am by Derek Muller

Anderson oral argument? [read post]

Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”

3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman

In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

[Jonathan H. Adler] What If Trump v. Anderson Is Treated Like an Election Law Case?

3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler

(Anderson-Burdick anyone?) [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

Weekend Roundup

2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst

Anderson Edition. [read post]

Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/

“Trump v. Anderson: the election law case that wasn’t (but might be).”

2 Feb 2024, 5:17 pm by Howard Bashman

“Trump v. [read post]