Search for: "ANDREWS v. AMERICAN STANDARD INC. et al" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[9] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[10]This materiality standard is reflected when materiality appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company periodic and current reports.[11] In the 90 years since Roosevelt described the intent of the federal securities laws and the 40 years since Jack’s paper, the core… [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
While the format for pleadings could be standardized to some degree, they are generally sufficient in framing the dispute, namely, setting forth the facts as relied upon by each side, and informing the other parties of the case they must meet. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
But it is clear that we cannot reverse those trends and enhance Americans’ trust in our financial institutions through our efforts alone. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
By Atreya Mathur “By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it. [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
Sources: Management Science Associates Inc., state revenue departments, author calculations. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Hunton Andrews Kurth also has a summary of the Guidelines here. [read post]
Lawyers from Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP’s insurance coverage practice report on three recent recall insurance disputes: In Kormondy Enterprises v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm by Richard Hunt
Lindsay v. 1777 Westwood Limited Partnership, et al.,2018 WL 4006425 (C.D. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the Eastern District of Virginia’s ruling in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
”[8] Parliament eventually enacted the Combating Counterfeit Products Act, which brought Canadian border measures to, or closer to, international standards. [read post]