Search for: "ANDREWS v. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS"
Results 61 - 80
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2022, 11:05 am
[District court's opinion in Gruber v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
Katakis, et. al., Corrected Notice of Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities 2 (May 5, 2014). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
New Issued cases There were two harassment claims issued in the Media and Communications list last week. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 2:40 am
Justifying his decision to file the motion, Fleischman cited the 1972 case Barker v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdr U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
In this case, the claimant, Andrew Carnegie, was injured at work by a female coworker with whom he had been romantically involved. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Case Background In July 2011, appellant Pamela Argabrite was injured in an accident following a high speed police chase of a fleeing offender named Andrew Barnhart. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:02 pm
After welcoming everyone to the event, EFF's Cindy Cohn began the evening's activities by introducing our intrepid Quiz Master Kurt Opsahl, and our judges Alex Moss, Andrew Crocker, and David Greene. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
The referendum was of course advisory, as stated in paragraph 106 of the judgment, and even accepted by the most high profile Leave campaigner, Nigel Farage, speaking on speaking on the Andrew Marr show5)BBC Andrea Marr show 6 November 2016. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Data Protection and Data Privacy Leading Digital Rights and Consumer NGOs have issued a declaration, “Fundamental Rights are Fundamental” [pdf] Andrew Parker, the head of MI5, has called for a ‘mature debate’ on intercepting communications data. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:37 pm
(See Olson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
However, he also stated that ‘if it was wrong, we would have corrected it’ and ‘we do believe in accuracy and correct things that are wrong’, statements which are flatly contradicted by the behaviour of The Times in the Norfolk stories which are the subject of Unmasked. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
On 22 November 2023, the Court of Appeal (Bean, Andrew and Lewis LLJ) handed down judgment in Department for Business and Trade v Information Commissioner [2023] EWCA Civ 1378. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
He has said that he believed he legally had to correct the police commissioner’s comment that he was a person of interest. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 8:26 am
Meade J thought this was correct, and so the answer to the first question was yes. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Stephen Bright and Sia Sanneh: 'Gideon v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
Legal Studies Paper No. 209, David Andrew Logan, Roger Williams University School of Law. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:15 am
See Pasco v. [read post]
