Search for: "ANDREWS v. GOOD"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2016, 3:47 am
The BBC has successfully defended a libel claim brought by the Chief Imam of Lewisham Islamic Centre in relation to comments made by Andrew Neill during a live interview in November 2013. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:14 pm
This may have made good radio, but as for court: no-one likes a smartaleck. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:31 am
Andrew Sievright, Domain Source, D2010-1916 (WIPO December 8, 2010) (omitting final “e” from trademark, ). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The threat of libel action is preventing scientific journals from discussing what is good and bad science. [read post]
4 May 2024, 11:09 am
From Hughes v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:24 am
(Eugene Volokh) An Australian court just held today, in Eatock v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 12:13 pm
Andrew Colton didn't like that. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:20 am
Despite a flurry of comments about epic (even intergalactic) battles between good and evil, Lucasfilm’s copyright appeal against prop designer Andrew Ainsworth has been heard by the UK Supreme Court with very little media coverage. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:19 pm
Hiter, 356 Ill.App.3d 574 (2005)), (Andrews v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 3:05 am
Whitford, on which it’s already heard oral argument [Benisek v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:26 am
The Supreme Court reversal May 13th in the case of Andrew Lee Watts v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:56 am
Posted on behalf of Alex Andrews and Jacqueline Zalapa. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:53 am
Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:28 am
Andrew Smith J accepted that, while not strictly a relief from sanction case, what the Court of Appeal in Mitchell applied, i.e. either the failure to comply with a rule or order was trivial or there had to be a good reason for the failure. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:28 am
Andrew Smith J accepted that, while not strictly a relief from sanction case, what the Court of Appeal in Mitchell applied, i.e. either the failure to comply with a rule or order was trivial or there had to be a good reason for the failure. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
The ‘rule in Bonnard v Perryman‘ provides that injunctions are denied in libel if the defendant promises credibly to defend the case at trial. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:51 am
Andrew Winerman has posted this draft on SSRN. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 3:25 pm
Andrew Hoffman contributed to this post. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 4:02 pm
Meanwhile, Andrew Trask has some good ideas for fixing the legal education system. [read post]
