Search for: "ANHEUSER-BUSCH, Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (California Biotech Law Blog) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Competitive Info) (Inventive Step) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (IP Frontline) (Patent Docs) (Intellectual Property Directions) (Post-Grant) European Commission proposes to open negotiations for adoption of agreement creating unified patent litigation system (IAM) (PatLit) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) EU Court of First Instance confirms refusal of… [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 7:22 am by John F. Fullerton III
In Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (Sept. 28, 2016), the company entered into a separation agreement in late 2012 with a specific employee after his termination and subsequent mediation of various alleged employment law claims. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:07 am by Ron Friedmann
Moderated by:  David Levine, General Counsel, Bloomberg LP Confirmed Speakers: Sabine Chalmers, Chief Legal & Corporate Affairs Officer, Anheuser-Busch InBev Michele Coleman Mayes, Vice President, General Counsel, The New York Public Library Christa D’Alimonte, Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel, Viacom, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 7:22 am by John F. Fullerton III
In Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (Sept. 28, 2016), the company entered into a separation agreement in late 2012 with a specific employee after his termination and subsequent mediation of various alleged employment law claims. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
However, it has been identified as a defence in the CJEU case of Budĕjovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (C-482/09).Hacon HHJ drew on the summary of honest concurrent use from Victoria Plum Ltd v Victorian Plumbing [2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch) (see IPKat analysis here), which established that it would be possible for two separate entities to co-exist, such that the inevitable confusion that arises has to be… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am by Alessandro Cerri
The judge held that the defence of statutory acquiescence raised by the Defendants under section 48 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994), could not succeed because the five year period only starts to run when the earlier trade mark owner has knowledge of both the use of the later trade mark, and of its registration (applying Case C-482/09, Budejovický Budvar np v Anheuser-Busch Inc [2011] ECR I-08701). [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(IPKat)   Global - Patents WIPO ponders role of patent in limiting climate change (Ars Technica) Managing patent costs in an economic downturn (Kenyon & Kenyon) FreePatentsOnline.com launches citepatents.com allowing bloggers, journalists to easily reference patent information and provide free patent search box for adding to websites (Patent Circle)   Global - Copyright Creative Commons recognised ‘for raising collective intelligence’ (Creative Commons)… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm by Kelly
Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated (Canadian Trademark Blog) STENNER – Feud over family name spills into Federal Court (Canadian Trademark Blog) Expungement: A poisoned trademark – for both parties: JAG Flocomponents N.A. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:35 pm
Anheuser-Busch is scoring points for some clever Super Bowl spots, but most advertising critics think this year's commercials were mostly underwhelming. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:18 am by Steve Baird
This is curious, as Goose Island is a Fulton Street Brewery brand, owned by Anheuser-Busch, a company quite familiar with protecting brands in connection with the consumable product known as beer. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
(China Law Blog) Queer eye for the straight blog, or how to spot a counterfeit perfume (China Hearsay) On the state of Intellectual Property in China (China Law Blog) Landmark in China: Law on intangible cultural heritages (TK Community) Europe Global dispute with only local significance: Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Bud? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) An appeal to the new Patent Office Director: Repeal the single sentence rule (Patently-O) ‘Troll Tracker’ defamation suit - trial underway: Albritton v Cisco (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (The Prior Art) Q2 2009 sees record number of US green patents (Green Patent Blog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: District Court’s summary judgment opinion found to be inconsistent with its own claim construction: Vita-Mix Corp v… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 7:02 am by Kristi L. Wolff and Cristina Ferretti
Anheuser-Busch filed a challenge using NAD’s Fast-Track SWIFT process, arguing that the videos falsely disparage Michelob Ultra and other light beers by claiming that consumers find them to taste like water. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
OHIM, José María Padilla Requena (1709 Blog) Inbev loses Budweiser CTM appeal: Anheuser-Busch Inc. v OHIM, Bud? [read post]