Search for: "APPLE, INC., a California corporation" Results 121 - 140 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2012, 3:48 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The complaint names Sony Corporation, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Apple, Inc. as licensees to the asserted patents. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:08 pm by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 5,519,867 owned by Apple Inc. and entitled OBJECT-ORIENTED MULTITASKING SYSTEM. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 7:50 am by Zak Gowen
  Apple Inc was sued by French app developers that accused the iPhone maker of violating U.S. antitrust law by overcharging them to use its app store. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
Majestic USA Capital, Inc. 11-36221 Compensation Risk Managers, LLC 11-36226 Compensation Risk Managers of California, LLC 11-36230 Eimar, LLC 11-36232 Embarcardero Insurance Holdings, Inc. 11-36234 Majestic Capital and its above-mentioned subsidiaries remain in possession of their respective assets and business, but subject to the supervision of the Court. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Van Dellen,[11] a California Federal District Court again ruled that officers are not protected by the business judgment rule both because the codification of the rule in California Corporations Code Section 309 only refers to directors and be [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:10 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The complaint alleges that the proposed respondents, Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California (“Apple”), Research in Motion, Ltd. of Canada, and Research In Motion Corporation of Irving, Texas (collectively, “RIM”) unlawfully import into the United States, sell for importation, and/or sell within the United States after importation certain mobile telephones and wireless communication devices featuring digital cameras, and components… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:51 pm by Bill Marler
In 1998 in what was the first criminal conviction in a large-scale food-poisoning outbreak, Odwalla Inc. pleaded guilty to violating Federal food safety laws and agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine for selling tainted apple juice that killed a 16-month-old girl and sickened 70 other people in several states in 1996. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am by Marie Louise
No. 337-TA-773 terminated as to respondents Optoma Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc. [read post]
  While the application of Code Section 265 has not been addressed by the Louisiana courts, the application of Code Section 265 to a very similar California interest expense attribution provision was addressed in Ampacet Corporation vs. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:14 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Other companies, such as Apple Inc. and Facebook Inc., some of the most cash-rich public companies, also rely on a steady influx of contractors. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 11:01 pm by Florian Mueller
., a corporation, and Activision Blizzard, Inc., a corporation: Answer and Defenses of Respondent Microsoft Corp.In the Matter of Microsoft Corp., a corporation, and Activision Blizzard, Inc., a corporation: Answer and Defenses of Respondent Activision Blizzard, Inc.Each complaint has three parts: introduction, item-by-item denials and admissions, and (partly affirmative) defenses. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
China Intelligent Lighting and Electronics, Inc., NIVS Intellimedia Technology Group, Inc., Tianfu Li, and Xuemei LiCase number: 13-cv-05079 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: July 22, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: March 10, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-28 In the Matter of Apple REIT Six, Inc.; Apple REIT Seven, Inc.; Apple REIT Eight, Inc.; Apple REIT Nine,… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:35 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Elan Microelectronics Corporation (“Elan”) and the Respondent is Apple Inc. [read post]