Search for: "APPLE, INC., a California corporation"
Results 121 - 140
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
., Inc., No. 2014-1019, -1242, -1243 (Fed. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:41 am
Facebook Wiretap Claims Against Gmail Scanning Survive Motion to Dismiss — In re: Google Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:39 am
Does Text Spam Class Action Against Jiffy Lube Moves Forward – In re Jiffy Lube Int’l, Inc., Text Spam Litigation California Appeals Court Says Emails That Don’t Identify Sender Violate State Spam Statute – Balsam v. [read post]
Shell Oil/Motiva Enterprises $4.5M FLSA Overtime Backpay Settlement Reminder To Pay Workers Properly
16 Sep 2014, 2:03 pm
About Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm
Apple Inc., Judge Ronald S. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 7:38 am
[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] on Friday rejected a bid by Adobe Systems Inc., Apple, Google, and Intel [corporate websites] to settle ongoing antitrust litigation brought by employees in the technology industry. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
("Apple") moves to voluntarily dismiss its cross-appeal, No. 2014-1368.Apple further moves to reform the official caption of the remaining appeal (No. 2014-1335) to reflect the dismissal of Apple's cross-appeal.Counsel for Apple has conferred with counsel for Samsung Electronics Corporation, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, "Samsung") regarding the… [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Hagood, ND California 2014http://t.co/jQWB2kq2ue -> Browse wrap agreement not enforced Tompkins v. 23andMe, INC., ND California 2014http://t.co/l9f8h0cudR -> Host liable for contributory infringement for not taking down infringing photo Rosen v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:49 pm
By Meg Thering On May 27, 2014, employees of high-tech firms in the Silicon Valley filed a motion in the Northern District of California seeking approval of a settlement agreement releasing antitrust claims they had brought against Adobe Systems, Incorporated, Apple Inc., Google, Inc., and Intel Corporation. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
China Intelligent Lighting and Electronics, Inc., NIVS Intellimedia Technology Group, Inc., Tianfu Li, and Xuemei LiCase number: 13-cv-05079 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: July 22, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: March 10, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-28 In the Matter of Apple REIT Six, Inc.; Apple REIT Seven, Inc.; Apple REIT Eight, Inc.; Apple REIT Nine,… [read post]
3 May 2014, 7:10 am
[JURIST] A jury in the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] on Friday ordered Samsung Electronics Co Ltd to pay $119.6 million to Apple Inc [corporate websites] for a finding that the company infringed on two of Apple's smartphone patents. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:18 am
For instance, Apple introduced iBeacon last year. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:57 am
Sections 1-14, and California Civil Code Section 1717. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Apple, Inc., No. 6:12- CV-100, slip op at 5 (E.D. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Google, Inc.: Does An Actor Have A Copyright Interest In His Or Her Performance In A Film? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
By Dennis Crouch In re Apple Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
LIGHT DESIGN, INC. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Van Dellen,[11] a California Federal District Court again ruled that officers are not protected by the business judgment rule both because the codification of the rule in California Corporations Code Section 309 only refers to directors and because prior [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Van Dellen,[11] a California Federal District Court again ruled that officers are not protected by the business judgment rule both because the codification of the rule in California Corporations Code Section 309 only refers to directors and be [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Qualcomm Inc. [read post]
