Search for: "APPLICATION OF MARTIN" Results 81 - 100 of 3,577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2015, 12:25 pm
Daou declined to forward the application for transfer to the minister responsible for approval and denied Chamber’s request. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
Martin McCaughey and Desmond Grew (whose next of kin are the Appellants in the instant case) were killed in 1990. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:44 am
Retirement Board’s failure to make an independent evaluation of an individual’s application for disability retirement fatal to the processSchlesinger v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 2010 NY Slip Op 20123, Decided on April 7, 2010, Supreme Court, Kings County, Judge Martin SchneierIn this Article 78 action Michael Schlesinger asked the court to annul, the action of the [New York City Employees’ Retirement System] denying his application… [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 7:02 pm by admin
Kara Shea is the editor of Tennessee Employment Law Letter and a partner with Miller & Martin PLLC, practicing in the Nashville office. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:54 am by Ritika Singh
CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 18 JANUARY 2011 Good afternoon. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:42 am by Ben Vernia
GSA awarded the NCCIPS task order in April 2004 to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), which teamed with Lockheed Martin and Applied Enterprise Solutions (AES) to perform under the task order. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:50 am by atussey@mortgagefraudblog.com
Martin, 38, Chicago, Illinois, was sentenced to six years in prison and ordered to pay $3,089,750 in restitution and $30,000 in forfeiture. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:02 pm by Ron Coleman
Fulton’s trademark application could be fuel for critics who contend Martins parents—and civil rights activists like Rev. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:45 am by Brad Kuhn
 In this particular case, the Court explained that “the trial court’s injunction intrudes on [the owner’s] established property right to exclude others by allowing the public to access Martins Beach pending a determination on [the owner’s] application for a CDP. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:45 am by Brad Kuhn
 In this particular case, the Court explained that “the trial court’s injunction intrudes on [the owner’s] established property right to exclude others by allowing the public to access Martins Beach pending a determination on [the owner’s] application for a CDP. [read post]
9 May 2016, 8:27 am by D. Daxton White
  Brokerage firms are required to supervise their agents to ensure that they are complying with all applicable investment rules. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:16 pm
The trial court prohibited enforcement of the ordinance based on the argument of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., a mining concern, that the City did not follow the statutory requirements applicable to enacting zoning ordinances. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:32 am
Martin had made several applications to secure mortgages from …Read More... [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 10:00 pm
Partner Nick Bolter and associate Martin Henshall authored an article for World Trademark Review about the decision in Manuka Honey Appellation Society Incorporate v Australian Manuka Honey Association Ltd , in which the UK Intellectual Property Office rejected an application to register Manuka Honey as a certification mark. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 10:00 pm
Partner Nick Bolter and associate Martin Henshall authored an article for World Trademark Review about the decision in Manuka Honey Appellation Society Incorporate v Australian Manuka Honey Association Ltd , in which the UK Intellectual Property Office rejected an application to register Manuka Honey as a certification mark. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:13 am by Ray Mullman
Here is one or two that seems applicable to many for profit nursing homes. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 10:00 pm
Partner Nick Bolter and associate Martin Henshall authored an article for World Trademark Review about the decision in Manuka Honey Appellation Society Incorporate v Australian Manuka Honey Association Ltd , in which the UK Intellectual Property Office rejected an application to register Manuka Honey as a certification mark. [read post]