Search for: "APPLIED COMPANIES V ARMY"
Results 1 - 20
of 356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 1:27 pm
Intervenor Defendant-Appellant Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), a phosphate mining company engaged in significant operations in Hardee County, Florida, appealed the order by the district court remanding a mining-permit issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) back to the agency and further enjoining Mosaic from conducting operations approved in that permit. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 10:29 am
Additional Resources: Sullwold v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:40 pm
The Mingo Logan Coal Company (Mingo Logan) applied to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for a permit under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to discharge dredged or fill material from a mountain-top coal mine in West Virginia into three streams and their tributaries. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Listen to the Tartan Army hereAlly's Tartan Army hereTart and Army here [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
” Given that Section 1237 directed the secretary of defense to designate certain Chinese companies as being “owned or controlled by the People’s Liberation Army[,]” this may have been one of the “several provisions” Clinton was referring to. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
In the case of Belle Company, L.L.C., et al., v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:10 am
In many long-term disability insurance policies, insurance companies struggle to almost always apply a mental illness limitation when the insured has both mental and physical complaints. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:48 pm
Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here). 33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 1:14 pm
Jetnil v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:10 am
In many long-term disability insurance policies, insurance companies struggle to almost always apply a mental illness limitation when the insured has both mental and physical complaints. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 6:31 pm
See Yari v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:05 pm
Cafasso v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:36 pm
But, that is what I think happened as a result of some quirks in some relatively obscure laws in a recent decision: The Canada Trust Company v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm
The latest criminal bulletin includes a case of a German shipping company and its employees that did not record transfers of oily waste-water on the M/V Cornelia, a German-owned commercial vessel. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:04 am
Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:46 am
Ma-Chis argues that the solicitation’s restriction did not apply to parent companies, and alternatively, that the solicitation was ambiguous as to whether the past performance of parent companies would be considered. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Craft v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
(See DSM-V). [read post]
