Search for: "ARIZONA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY v STATE OF ARIZONA"
Results 1 - 20
of 297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2020, 4:26 pm
” It has a Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, but it’s affiliated with the national Democratic Party and participates in the Democratic National Convention.We might want a disaffiliation statute if you’re an Arizona Republican running for an nonpartisan slot for, say, Congress or the state legislature. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:47 am
There are 31 Republicans and 29 Democrats in the Arizona State House, and one member per party crossed the aisle, thereby canceling each other out.A couple of proposed amendments failed, while a proposal by Dr. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
The plaintiffs in the case, a group of Arizona voters, argued that the commission had not distributed Arizona residents evenly among the state legislative districts: it put too many people in some Republican districts, while it put too few in some Democratic districts. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:07 pm
But that's a different story.The question that the case of United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:36 am
In 2012, the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission redrew the map for the state legislative districts based on the results of the 2010 census. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
The Supreme Court on Thursday narrowed somewhat its plan to review the work of the independent Arizona agency that drew new election districts for the state legislature after the latest census. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 11:55 am
The Supreme Court issued its decision in Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In particular, the plaintiffs—individual Arizona voters—complain that the commission “diluted or inflated the votes of almost two million American citizens when [it] intentionally and systematically overpopulated sixteen Republican districts while underpopulating eleven Democrat districts . . . with the intent of creating an advantage for the Democratic party. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
In June 2020, the Arizona Democratic Party and the Democratic National Committee sued the state regarding its inconsistent policy of discarding mail ballots that are missing a signature on the return envelope without providing such voters the same notice and opportunity to fix the error afforded to voters whose envelope signature does not match the signature in their voter registration record. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:52 am
The cases, Arizona Republican Party v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:13 pm
Williamson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 1:43 pm
Arizona In Arizona Democratic Party v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 3:46 pm
Democratic National Committee and Arizona Republican Party v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Facts of Harris v Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Following the 2010 census, Arizona’s independent redistricting commission (Commission), which included two Republicans, two Democrats, and one Independent, redrew Arizona’s legislative districts. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am
Right at the start of the discussion on Section 5, Judge Bea identified Arizona’s problem: Nat’l Ctr. for Immigrants’ Rights, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Specifically, the plaintiffs—individual Arizona voters—complained that the commission “diluted or inflated the votes of almost two million American citizens when [it] intentionally and systematically overpopulated sixteen Republican districts while underpopulating eleven Democrat districts . . . with the intent of creating an advantage for the Democratic party. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court was then enlisted to consider this case and to decide, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 1:55 pm
In Arizona Democratic Party v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:10 am
There, the Arizona Green Party argued that certain candidates were placed on the ballot solely to draw votes away from the Democratic Party and requested a temporary restraining order to prohibit those candidates from being listed. [read post]
