Search for: "AT&T CORP. V. JACKSON UTILITIES, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
City of New Rochelle, 256 N.Y. 190, 195, 176 N.E. 138 (1931); Office Park Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Judge Weinstein observed that when the hand waving stopped, “[t]here is no evidence that plaintiffs were exposed to the far higher concentrations involved in both animal and industrial exposure studies. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
But it was the ruling’s impact on utility regulation, not the cost, that prompted the appeals court to reverse the decision. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Michael Aubele, Valley News Dispatch, April 27, 2010 The federal Environmental Protection Agency and Allegheny County Health Department want a federal judge to sign off on an agreement with Allegheny Ludlum Corp. and Harsco Corp. intended to control slag dust at the Ludlum steel mill in Natrona. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Even if the meeting did result in aggressive, binding reduction targets, achieving those reductions won’t reduce atmospheric CO2 enough to prevent catastrophic climate change. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Landfill gas collected by the separate Middlesex County Utilities Authority (MCUA) and Edgeboro Disposal Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
., with Blue Tee Corp., former operator of the mine, for $1.36 million. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The waste-control measures weren’t completed until late 2008. [read post]