Search for: "ATP Tour, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2014, 5:00 pm
On May 22, 2014, the Delaware Corporate Law Council proposed an amendment to the DCGL that according to the amendment’s synopsis is “intended to limit the applicability of [the Delaware Supreme Court decision in ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:31 am
Here’s news from Paul Weiss (memos on this case are posted in the “Securities Litigation” Practice Area): In an opinion that may dramatically change the landscape of stockholder litigation, the Delaware Supreme Court upheld – in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:02 am
District Court for the District of Delaware captioned ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
As discussed in earlier posts (here and here) the Delaware Supreme Court in ATP Tour v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am
One of the more significant recent developments in the corporate and securities litigation arena has been the emergence of the debate over fee-shifting bylaws following the Delaware Supreme Court’s May 2014 decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:06 am
” The fight bubbled up after Delaware Supreme Court ruling last month that upheld a fee-shifting bylaw adopted by a private company, ATP Tour Inc. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:44 am
Now Francis Pileggi of Eckert Seamans blogs this news: A proposed new addition and amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law would limit the impact of a recent Delaware Supreme Court decision in ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:06 am
Earlier this year, after the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the facial validity of fee-shifting bylaws in the case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 6:21 am
But that uncertainty was resolved, at least in Delaware, through the case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 6:17 am
Chevron Corp ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
As discussed in earlier posts (here and here), the Delaware Supreme Court in ATP Tour v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:49 am
One method which proved successful for ATP Tour Inc. was a fee-shifting by-law. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
ATP Tour was then sued for antitrust violations and breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
ATP Tour was then sued for antitrust violations and breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
On May 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Delaware held in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:12 pm
This narrow interpretation of Section 109 was stretched to the breaking point by the Delaware Supreme Court’s en banc decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:21 am
Background As I discussed in a recent post (here), in a May 8, 2014 decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:41 am
Justice Carolyn Berger’s 14-page opinion in ATP Tour Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 6:23 am
As a first step, the legislature prohibited Delaware stock companies from enacting fee-shifting bylaws in the wake of the Delaware Supreme Court’s ruling in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:00 pm
The proposed legislation linked above is a result of the ATP case, styled as ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
