Search for: "AZADI V. AZADI"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
A recent decision of the Bombay High Court in CIT v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:56 am
In that regard reliance may be placed on a Full Bench judgment of this Court rendered in the case of State of Punjab v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 10:44 am
C.I.T. (1999), and the 2003 decision of the Supreme Court in Azadi Bachai Andolan. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 12:20 am
Further, in State of West Bengal v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:46 am
In the leading Indian decision on the point, Linklaters v ITO, this solution has been rejected. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:01 am
National Travel Services, CIT v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:58 pm
(An earlier note on this blog has analysed how far Azadi actually goes in this direction.)Among the Indian decisions which have taken into consideration the developments in British law is the judgment of the Madras High Court in Novartis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:20 pm
V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:01 pm
Although this is not a subject we can explore in detail here, the conclusion in Burmah Oil, unlike Furniss v Dawson, is unaffected by the subsequent decisions of the English courts.The Bombay High Court has relied on the observation in the judgment of the Chief Justice in ¶64 of Vodafone that there is no conflict between McDowell and Azadi Bachao Andolan in those cases in which the taxpayer uses “colourable devices”. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
Radhakrishnan J. reach the same conclusion that Azadi Bachao remains good law, there are some differences in the reasoning. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
In this connection, the recent decision by the Authority for Advance Rulings in Star TV v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 11:02 am
" That the provisions are a "cause of concern" appears to be a massive understatement.Typically, tax avoidance is considered to be legal; tax evasion is illegal (Azadi Bachao Andolan v. [read post]
