Search for: "Aas v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2018, 1:25 pm
Superior Court (2000) 24 Cal.4th 627, 632 (Aas), this court held that the economic loss rule bars homeowners suing in negligencefor construction defects from recovering damages where there is no showing of actual property damage or personal injury. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:03 pm
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited (ACN 113 114 832) (No. 4) [2007] FCA 963, the Federal Court has dismissed ASIC's claims and decided that : (a) Citigroup did not contravene its obligations under s 912A(1)(aa) of the Corporations Act to have in place adequate arrangements for the management of conflicts of interest (as it did not have a conflict); and (b) … [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 3:49 pm
Here are the rules for Superior Court of New Hampshire 111 K. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:29 pm
Rather unusually, faced with one of the most coruscating High Court judgments I can recall, in AA V LB Southwark [our report here], the senior officers of Southwark Council have chosen to do neither. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 7:19 am
(Aas v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 am
Code § 17701.02(aa). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:52 pm
In case number 20-AA-693, the court affirmed the Mayor’s Agent’s order approving the Lot 108 subdivision. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
These are the first decisions in a wave of closely watched litigation challenges in California following the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm
Superior Court of Orange County (1992) 9 Cal App.4th 162, and McIndoe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
Clay v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 9:46 am
The Act was enacted in response to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Aas v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
(aa).) [read post]
16 May 2014, 3:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:43 pm
Superior Court of Orange County (1992) 9 Cal App.4th 162, and McIndoe v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:05 am
Superior Court (2000) 24 Cal.4th 627. [read post]
13 Feb 2006, 12:23 pm
The placement of this burden on the creditor is further suggested by the court's caution in its earlier decision, In re Charles, 332 B.R. 538 (Bankr. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 1:58 pm
Cerqueira v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
Will’s editorial in the Washington Post argues that SCOTUS should grant cert in the Fisher v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
See Salamone‑Finchum v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 10:49 am
In contrast to Hernandez, the Court in Drenth v. [read post]
