Search for: "Abbey v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
A California State University Professor studied 1,001 couples around the world who had reunited after divorcing. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
In 2012, the state Court of Appeals entertained Constitutional challenges brought by Vermitsky in another case, Filipowski v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Using the example of R. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am
On Tuesday 4 March 2014 is the matter of R (George) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Like Edith in Downton Abbey, mayhaps we simply were not destined to be happy. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
The case is Belmont Abbey College v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 5:42 pm
Supreme Court denied review in Castille v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm
Abbey (historic grazing lands)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: Sheffer v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:14 pm
Who doesn’t want a spot o f tea while watching Downton Abbey? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:25 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
We found that case in the Accutane MDL - specifically, Aranda et al. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 10:28 pm
On the appellate front, Wheaton College and Belmont Abbey College v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:31 pm
Also worth noting, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has ordered oral argument in the Belmont Abbey College appeal of the original “ripeness” decision for December 14, 2012. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 4:24 pm
Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections Carl J. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:28 pm
Bruning v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
Abbey (historic grazing lands)Blackfeet Housing v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:05 am
llr=ofg87a44&v=0015Yzr3j_... [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
The court concluded that the extended effective “effective date” and enforcement safe harbor period coupled with the Administration’s “promise” of further amendments to address the issues presented rendered the challenge in Belmont Abbey College v. [read post]
