Search for: "Abbott v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 1,774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Tenth Circuit has not yet ruled on whether such a First Amendment right of access exists in civil cases, see United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
Laws banning truthful business speech about lawful conduct should trip First Amendment review [Ilya Shapiro on Cato amicus brief in Seeberger v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
The court addressed who owned what copyright in computer software developed by a service provider, but where the express contractual provisions left a lacuna as to IPR ownership.Annsley Merelle Ward reviews the ex tempore decision of Mr Justice Carr in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:40 am by William K. Berenson
They have the support of Governor Abbott and a majority of state representatives. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Abbott Labs., 297 F.3d 544, 545-46 (7th Cir. 2002) (stating that notwithstanding prior confidentiality agreements, “any claim of secrecy must be reviewed independently in [the appellate] court”). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Abbott Labs., 297 F.3d 544, 545-46 (7th Cir. 2002) (stating that notwithstanding prior confidentiality agreements, "any claim of secrecy must be reviewed independently in [the appellate] court"). [read post]