Search for: "Abercrombie and Fitch Stores Inc" Results 81 - 100 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2015, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., the Court will address whether an employer can be liable under the Civil Rights Act for refusing to hire an employee based on religion only if the employer actually knew that a religious accommodation was required based on knowledge received directly from the job applicant. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. could impact other situations in which employees may need accommodations from employers, such as for a disability, or for gender-identity related issues. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:58 pm by Pamela Wolf
Following that conference, the Justices granted the petition for cert in EEOC v Abercrombie and Fitch Stores, Inc. and dismissed as improvidently granted Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., a case involving an employee who wore a headscarf (or "hijab") to work for religious reasons, but was told to remove because it conflicted with Abercrombie's clothing policy. [read post]
Abercrombie & Fitch, the Ninth Circuit found that the unauthorized use of several photographs of surf legends in an Abercrombie clothing catalog was commercial, notwithstanding that the images were employed to illustrate the catalogue’s underlying surf theme.[17] The Ninth Circuit stated that the photographs were mere “window dressing” to the catalog’s surf motif and ultimately were exploited to promote Abercrombie’s clothing… [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. 14-86Issue: Whether an employer can be liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for refusing to hire an applicant or discharging an employee based on a “religious observance and practice” only if the employer has actual knowledge that a religious accommodation was required and the employer's actual knowledge resulted from direct, explicit notice from the applicant or employee. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:05 pm by Maureen Johnston
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. 14-86 Issue: Whether an employer can be liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights At of 1964 for refusing to hire an applicant or discharging an employee based on a “religious observance and practice” only if the employer has actual knowledge that a religious accommodation was required and the employer’s actual knowledge resulted from direct, explicit notice from the applicant or employee. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm by Cicely Wilson
Abercrombie & Fitch, et al, US 10th Cir. (8/29/14)Business Law, Civil Rights, Class Action, ContractsDefendants–Appellants Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., and J.M. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 11:36 am by Sme
Dillard Store Services, Inc. (10th Cir., August 27, 2014) (reversing dismissal of plaintiff's claims) [read post]