Search for: "Abkco Music "
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
The result: Sirius XM will be paying $210 million to resolve all claims that had been advanced in the lawsuit brought by Capitol, Sony, UMG, Warner and ABKCO with respect to performance royalties for transmitting music recorded prior to February, 1972. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
The result: Sirius XM will be paying $210 million to resolve all claims that had been advanced in the lawsuit brought by Capitol, Sony, UMG, Warner and ABKCO with respect to performance royalties for transmitting music recorded prior to February, 1972. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:40 pm
As I reported in September, Sirius XM (and, by extension, just about any other provider of streamed digital music) suffered a setback in a Federal District Court in California when the judge there ruled that performers have an exclusive public performance right to music they recorded prior to February 15, 1972. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
ABKCO v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:13 am
., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994) (United States) and Abkco Music & Records Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Copyright Office released a comprehensive study, “Copyright and the Music Marketplace” detailing the ageing music licensing framework as well as the ever-evolving needs of those who create and invest in music in the twenty-first century. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:52 am
” A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: ABKCO Music, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Record Labels Sue Sirius XM Over the Use of Older Music First off today, Ben Sisario at The New York Times reports that the three major record labels as well as ABKCO, an independent group of labels, have filed a lawsuit against SirusXM alleging that the service does not have permission to use sound recordings made before 1972. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mary Strobel has indicated that she was leaning towards rejecting a motion by Warner, Universal, Sony, Capitol and ABKCO Records to accept the labels' interpretation of the law in jury instructions. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:37 pm
ABKCO Music v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
Alisa Coleman, ABKCO Music & Records: Broken: need notice and staydown. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
On September 11, 2013, five major record labels (ABKCO Music & Records, Capitol Records, Sony Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, and Warner Music Group) filed a similar lawsuit in state court in California. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Alisa Coleman: ABKCO Music & Records: 512 is broken. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Today’s guest post comes from Copyhype contributor Devlin Hartline. [read post]
