Search for: "Abney v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 4:23 pm
The Court of Appeal is right, and Legal Aid is wrong. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:05 pm
A ruling in Oklahoma v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:58 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 4:27 am
” Abney v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
He just has not ruled in the State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
Head is a split opinion that is reminiscent of United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
Head is a split opinion that is reminiscent of United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
The majority found that Abney satisfied the rigorous standards of Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 10:19 pm
The principles in the case of Abney v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
American Bush v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
Citing People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
See Abney v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
See Abney v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 7:34 am
Abney v. [read post]