Search for: "Abril-Rivera v. Johnson"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2015, 7:44 am
In addition, citing the recent High Court ruling, the majority found that the challenged actions were job-related and consistent with business necessity and that the plaintiffs failed to show there were alternatives available to FEMA that would have had less disparate impact and served FEMA’s legitimate needs (Abril-Rivera v Johnson, July 30, 2015, Lynch, S.). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:25 pm
Lastly, the majority ruled both retaliation claims failed because the plaintiffs did not demonstrate that the allegedly adverse employment actions were causally related to any protected conduct (Abril-Rivera v Johnson, July 30, 2015, Lynch, S; to be reported at 99 EPD ¶45,357). [read post]
