Search for: "Access Reports v. Department of Justice, Appellant" Results 161 - 180 of 431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2021, 5:25 pm by Michael Lowe
  Anyone sentenced to second degree felony punishment faces imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice system (TDC) for two (2) to twenty (20) years. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 1:18 pm by Mark Walsh
My colleague Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal reported last week that Stanton himself used the Communication Access Realtime Translation, or CART, system when he was presented for the Court’s bar in 2005. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
If so, we then consider whether the error resulted in manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
During her time in the Department of Justice, Kruger twice received the attorney general’s award for exceptional service, the department’s “highest award for employee performance. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Allman v Koehler, 161 A.D.2d 114]Dismissal of a 17-year employee who failed to report her intended absence on two occasions. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
This Court has explained: "It is axiomatic that the courts must be independent and must not be subject to the whim of either the executive or legislative departments. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am by Roel van Woudenberg
As to the principle of public oral proceedings the appellant disputed that the public had proper access to the videoconference, as required by Article 116 EPC.In addition the appellant noted that the right to be heard could be affected by an unstable or interrupted Internet connection. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
The Justice Department asked for the stay Wednesday in the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  He points out to contributory factors such as false accusations, misleading police investigative work, inept defence counsel, misperceptions by Crown prosecutors of their role, factual assumption of an accused’s guilt by actors in the criminal justice system, community pressure for a conviction, inadequate identification evidence, perjury, false confessions, inadequate or misinterpreted forensic evidence, judicial bias, poor presentation of an appellate case, and… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  He points out to contributory factors such as false accusations, misleading police investigative work, inept defence counsel, misperceptions by Crown prosecutors of their role, factual assumption of an accused’s guilt by actors in the criminal justice system, community pressure for a conviction, inadequate identification evidence, perjury, false confessions, inadequate or misinterpreted forensic evidence, judicial bias, poor presentation of an appellate case, and… [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:29 am by Apostolos Anthimos
The proportionality principle should be interpreted in a twofold fashion: It is true that high costs may hinder effective access to Justice according to Article 6.1 ECHR and Article 20 of the Greek Constitution. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
"FOIL is to be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, 252; see Buffalo News, Inc. v Buffalo Enterprise Dev. [read post]