Search for: "Ace Construction Company, a Corporation v. the United States" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2024, 9:08 am by Luciano Alvarado
Celanese International Corporation, Celanese (Malta) Company 2 Limited, and Celanese Sales U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Identify the legal framework within which the regulation of corporate social responsibility is framed within the United States, within international organizations, and among corporate actors.2. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
Lord Templeman referred to the principle in Salomon v Salomon & co Ltd [1896] UKHL 1, as the ‘unyielding rock’ on which company law is constructed. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
First, the compatibility of United Kingdom corporate taxation with certain principles of EU law and the liabilities of the Revenue to a taxpayer who has overpaid tax on the basis of incompatible United Kingdom legislation. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
HDEC’s corporate governance also constitutes a weak point for effective anti-corruption activities. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The US experience, as shown by securities class actions such as Owens Corning v National Union Fire Insurance Co [6], indicates that the construction of exclusions is not a simple issue. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 3:45 am by Peter J. Sluka
  But in cases of equal treatment—the manager deciding against distributions to any member—the courts generally defer to the business judgment of the manager (see, e.g., Simon v Moskowitz, 193 AD3d 520 [1st Dept 2021] [discussed in this post]; Estate of Alexander Calderwood v Ace Group Intern. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am by Robert B. Milligan
  Moreover, the court noted that it was undisputed that defendant had decades of “know-how and experience,” including with submitting bids for industrial construction projects. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 6:39 pm
Part II considered the UNGP's General Principles; Part III examines the State duty to protect human rights (UNGP Principles 1-10); Part IV then addresses commentary to the corporate responsibility to respect human rights (UNGP Principles 11-24); and Part V considers the remedial principles (UNGP Principles 25-31). [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:47 pm by The Legal Blog
In Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation Vs. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Other states may choose to take a different approach. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Specialty Food Produce Company, Inc., Safety National Casualty Corporation, administered by Tristar Risk Management, Defendants, 2024 Cal. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Spicy IP) Israel English version of Israel patent database available (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office gears up for filing online (The IP Factor) Adjudicator of IP rules AMERICAN APPAREL lacks distinguishing features (The IP Factor) ‘Ein Gedi’ not acceptable as a word mark (The IP Factor) Japan Japan starts new patent prosecution highways with Austrian Patent Office and IP Office of Singapore (Managing Intellectual Property) Libya Libya cuts trade mark filing… [read post]