Search for: "Ace v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,880
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet  165   Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181   America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty  193    Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Some examples of Schedule V drugs are: cough preparations with less than 200 milligrams of codeine or per 100 milliliters (Robitussin AC), Lomotil, Motofen, Lyrica, Parepectolinfedeerala. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm by Mark Ashton
Scott & Anor v Scott | [1913] AC 417 | United Kingdom House of Lords | Judgment | Law | CaseMine In a lengthy footnote, the dissent parses the majority’s conclusion and citations related to divorce being open to public scrutiny. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Howard Knopf
This was preceded by the Court’s 2015 decision in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:02 pm by Laura
The term ‘Gillick competent’ comes from the case of Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) AC 112. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by CMS
  The shipowners issued bills of lading which were stated to incorporate the terms of the voyage charterparty. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]