Search for: "Ace v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 1,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2014, 1:15 am by Anita Davies
This appeared to be the analysis of Lord Brown in R (Black) v Justice Secretary [2009] 1 AC 949 when considering West. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:36 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Front Ace, Owners of the Ship v Vicky 1, Owners of the Ship [2008] EWCA Civ 101 (26 February 2008) FK (Kenya) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 119 (26 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) W Stevenson & Sons (A Partnership)& Anor v R [2008] EWCA Crim 273 (25 February 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Telles v South West Strategic Health… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:21 am by Deepak Gupta
Here's the video of the American Constitution Society's panel discussion on AT&T v. [read post]
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Martinez v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 04096 Decided on June 23, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Martinez v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 04096 Decided on June 23, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
15 May 2009, 5:25 am
Relying on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
This was because a non-exclusive licence agreement between Ford and AC Cars in 1996 stated that it was limited to vehicles manufactures in the UK, but was “without limit” as to sales and marketing territory, meaning that AC Cars could sell cars into the US, provided it carried appropriate insurance. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:56 pm
AC-USA was not permitted to sell AcryliCon Systems outside of the United States without permission from AC-International. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:09 am by sally
In a unanimous ruling the Court held that the UK could not lawfully deport Abu Qatada to his native Jordan, overturning the House of Lords (who had unanimously come to the opposite conclusion in RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10, [2010] 2 AC 110).” Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 19th January 2012 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:09 am by sally
In a unanimous ruling the Court held that the UK could not lawfully deport Abu Qatada to his native Jordan, overturning the House of Lords (who had unanimously come to the opposite conclusion in RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10, [2010] 2 AC 110).” Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 19th January 2012 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:49 am by Eric Goldman
She declined, essentially admitting that no additional facts could be alleged that might state her claims under the ATA or state law. [read post]