Search for: "Acevedo v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:34 am
Acevedo, 627 F.2d 68, 69 n. 1 (7th Cir.1980); United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:10 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 8:38 am
” United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Also, King involves privacy in new technologies The nine-to-zero vote in the recent GPS decision, United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:47 pm
Kyllo to be a search), but the analogy fails because of the limited information dog sniffs reveal. In past cases, notably United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 3:25 pm
See United States v. $639,558 U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
The next part of Judge Posner’s discussion: I noticed a citation in the court’s opinion to a case from my court, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:25 am
United States (342 U.S. 246 [1952] ), ... [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 4:54 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 4:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:14 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Court Need Not Give Notice Before Imposing Sentence Outside Guidelines Range for Breach of Release Terms United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/01/28/09-50088.pdf United States v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 8:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:03 pm
State- Facts- Acevedo was found guilty of murder. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 4:26 am
ATC, Duran, Valera and Acevedo are charged with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, to receive health care kickbacks and to pay health care kickbacks. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:02 am
ATC, Duran, Valera and Acevedo are charged with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, to receive health care kickbacks and to pay health care kickbacks. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 10:14 am
Yet the Court was careful in Belton to distinguish United States v. [read post]
