Search for: "Ackerman v Ackerman"
Results 81 - 100
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2020, 10:18 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Collins v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
” (Ackerman v Kesselman, 100 AD3d 577, 579 [2d Dept 2012].) [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:47 am
" Dana Incorporated v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 12:23 pm
National Rifle Ass’n v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
Bruce Ackerman and Democratic Rep. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 8:37 pm
Here, in Ackerman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
He views Justice Marshall, in the 1803 Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
In the process the article raises questions about how we should understand the scope of the achievement of those who sponsored and ratified the Reconstruction amendments.In the last part of “Optimistic Originalism” I discuss why Brown is commonly viewed as a “living constitutionalist” opinion (Here and elsewhere in these posts I put living constitutionalism in scare quotes because I think the real issue is how to understand the process of constitutional change outside… [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm
Connecticut and particularly since Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Popular Constitutionalism and Bruce Ackerman’s theory of “constitutional moments” are examples of this approach. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:00 pm
Derivative v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
” It was assumed that such adaptation would invoke Article V at the national level. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Bruce Ackerman and others have suggested that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments may not have met Article V’s requirements, but attained legitimacy through other means.Similarly, it may mean that the Nineteenth Amendment and the Equal Rights Amendment can be legitimized through means other than Article V. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:28 am
The case is Knopf v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
If the E.R.A. rescissions are overlooked for purposes of counting to 38, then it becomes harder to deny that the four recent rescissions of Article V applications can be overlooked for purposes of counting to 34—putting us on the brink of our first-ever Article V convention.The puzzles don’t end there. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:28 am
If the E.R.A. rescissions are overlooked for purposes of counting to 38, then it becomes harder to deny that the four recent rescissions of Article V applications can be overlooked for purposes of counting to 34—putting us on the brink of our first-ever Article V convention.The puzzles don’t end there. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
