Search for: "Adam Winkler"
Results 1 - 20
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
I’d like to thank members of the SEC staff for their work on these final rules, including: Mellissa Duru, Luna Bloom, Elliot Staffin, Kristin Baldwin, Valian Afshar, Almaze Semere, Dennis Hermreck, Nolan McWilliams, Grace Baer, Lindsay McCord, Ethan Horowitz, Robert Errett, Deegi Biteng, Adam Turk, Ted Yu, Liz Walsh, Duc Dang, Brad Skinner, Mike Reedich, Kat Bagley, Cheryl Brown, Jeb Byrne, Nabeel Cheema, John Fieldsend, Jason Weidberg, Michael Coco, Angie Kim, Charli Gibbs-Tabler,… [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:14 am
“Even as mass shootings multiply, federal judges are erasing gun safety laws”: Law professor Adam Winkler has this essay online at The Los Angeles Times. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal No Rest Between Censuses for Congressional Mapmakers DNyuz – Reid Epstein (New York Times) | Published: 3/10/2023 For just about all of the nation’s history, politicians would fight over redistricting for a short period after each once-a-decade census, then forget about congressional maps until the next reapportionment. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 10:05 am
Will Baude has written a column in the Washington Post, entitled Of Course the Supreme Court Needs to Use History. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
Adam Winker writes, The pattern-- critiquing originalism, insisting that the interpretation of the constitutional text evolve to meet changed conditions in society, and pursuing reform through litigation strategies that made evolution central to judicial reasoning--has come to define modern living constitutionalism. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:34 am
Indeed, at the end of the article, the author quotes Adam Winkler, a Supreme Court expert at the University of California Los Angeles, as noting that “For Winkler, the greater concern is not prayers, but the “religious-themed” decisions he’s seen come down from the high court this term, pointing to not only the Roe reversal but also opinions that permit unchecked free exercise of First Amendment rights. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 6:46 am
On Bruen: Adam Winkler interviewed on cherry-picked history in the New Yorker. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:07 am
" Said lawprof Adam Winkler, author of “Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America,” quoted in "The Historical Cherry-Picking at the Heart of the Supreme Court’s Gun-Rights Expansion/A century-old New York law requiring individuals to prove “proper cause” to carry a handgun has been struck down. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
Professor Adam Winkler contends that this distinction makes no legal difference. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm
Bloomberg Law Podcasts interviews two legal historians on this term’s Supreme Court cases, Adam Winkler on the Second Amendment, and Mary Ziegler on reproductive rights.Save the date: Oxford University Faculty of Law announces a Book Talk for Thai Legal History (CUP, 2021), by Andrew Harding and Munin Pongsapan, February 25, 2022, 12:00PM to 1:00PM. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 7:12 pm
” Law professor Adam Winkler has this guest essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 7:13 am
(Adam Winkler, The New York Times) Can the Ivy League continue to ban athletic scholarships? [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 8:24 pm
Adam Winkler repeated this argument in the New York Times. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 12:38 pm
” Law professor Adam Winkler has this guest essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:17 am
Professor Adam Winkler from the UCLA School of Law joins us for a high caliber discussion about New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
Adam Winkler, a specialist in gun policy at the UCLA School of Law, made a similar argument. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:52 pm
Savage, Los Angeles TimesProfessor Adam Winkler, UCLA School of LawRegister here! [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 8:26 pm
” Law professor Kent Greenfield and Adam Winkler have this essay online at The Hill. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 7:34 am
John Roberts May Not Be the Ally Gun-Rights Advocates Hoped For By Adam Winkler, Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law Adam Winkler says that the Supreme Court’s decision to not take up any of the pending gun rights cases before it suggests Chief Justice John Roberts is not as pro-gun rights as some hoped. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
” Briefly: At The Atlantic (via How Appealing), Adam Winkler suggests that “[o]ne conclusion to draw … from Monday’s denial” of a petitions for review in a number of major gun rights cases “is that Chief Justice Roberts may not be so in favor of broadly expanding the scope of the Second Amendment. [read post]
