Search for: "Adame v. Holder, Jr." Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak at The New York Times. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Alessi, Esquire, Adam Slutsky, Esquire, GOODWIN PROCTER LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP, Great Hill Investors LLC, Fremont Holdco, Inc., and BlueSnap, Inc. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
Roberts Jr. is less activist than any court in the last 60 years. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  With the exception of memoirs published posthumously, I did not include in the tally, as indicated above, collections of writings compiled and published after a Justice’s lifetime as in the case of The Essential Holmes: Selections from the Letters, Speeches, Judicial Opinions, and Other Writings of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:53 am by Lovechilde
Shelby County, Alabama v Holder  (2010) is challenging the constitutionality of section 5. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]