Search for: "Adams v. Adams" Results 141 - 160 of 7,920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2023, 12:28 am by Chijioke Okorie
In Kenya, the High Court dismissed an application for injunction in Netresource Limited v Ministry of Education & 3 others stating that no prima facie case was established. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by centerforartlaw
Gall sent requests for the return of these items, but Zurich was adamant that title for the objects had been validly transferred. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:31 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Sonos has filed its notice appealing Judge Alsup’s recent decision in Sonos v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:48 am by Patricia Salkin
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v Town of Mount Pleasant, 2023 WL 4491197 (D. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
By Alexandra Even Banksy’s anonymity is as a part of his brand as his art. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
Ronen Bergmen and Adam Goldman report for the New York Times. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:33 am by Dennis Crouch
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, said the court, citing  Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, said the court, citing  Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]